Saturday, February 20, 2010

CYA? Or,...

We have seen recently a step, and I do mean a step, toward holding longwall mining outfits like Consol Energy responsible for their actions. Pennsylvania's DEP has said that Consol's mining operation was the direct cause of the destruction of Ryerson Lake in Greene County.

What that proclamation suggests is that, at least in PA, those who are charged with protection of the world at large from the criminal element that is longwall mining, may be slowly awakening to the fact that they have been negligent, and perhaps criminally so, for a very long time.

Having said that, I must give them an "atta boy" for making even this most obvious declaration. It must have taken some bit of courage, political and otherwise. And, it is appreciated by all who have worked so diligently to make it happen. Specifically, the activists in the area who have stood against Consol Energy.

DEP has taken the first step. But, now what? Having stated publicly that Consol Energy was the direct cause of the destruction of Ryerson Lake, what remedy do they intend to call for? Is the dam to be rebuilt? The lake restored to it's previous condition? Is Consol to pay for not only the restoration of the lake, but the damage they have done, and continue to do to the farmers who have lost their water due to longwall mining? Late to the dance? Of course. Governments tend to be reactive rather than active. But, what happens next is of great import to not only Greene County, but the world at large. Is DEP going to begin providing meaningful oversight? Not just rubber stamping permits, but actually looking to see what damage might be caused by the longwall mining process? Not just slapping wrists, but levying stiff, and progressive fines for damage that is done?

So, what have we seen? A CYA step? Or, can we expect DEP to begin following it's mandate to protect the ecosystem both small an large? I know what I am hoping for. And, by and by, we will all know.

Thursday, February 04, 2010

Connections

Longwall mining activity is increasing in Australia, while evidence mounts that it is greatly impacting rivers. These same activities are to go ahead under Illinois Highway 185, with subsidence a known factor.

What is the connection? The connection is the close ties between the companies who will do anything, including the destruction of their own world, and those in government who are charged with oversight of those companies.

It really is no surprise to anyone that mining companies will destroy any and every ecosystem to get the ore they are after. They do it all over the world. And, the destruction they cause is no secret, either. It has been captured on film and is widely available to all.

What is not so widely spoken of, but certainly should be, is the connection to government. The very people we depend upon to protect our air and water, are as much of the problem as those doing the actual polluting and killing.

For any mining operation to begin, a permit must be issued. That permit comes from those who act on our behalf. If those people know that a longwall mining operation will dewater an area, or that it will cause road damage in the future, why would they issue a permit?

It cerainly couldn't be the record. The recordis ffilled with examples of the destruction caused by longwall mining. From release of mercury and arsenic upon first contact, to these same elements being pumped into our waterways after being burned.
And, it certainly isn't common sense. For common sense would give pause before allowing the destruction of our roads and waterways.

So, what could be the possible reason? How about, those who are supposed to be looking out for our collective welfare are in fact no more than shills for those who would cause the physical damage? If dewatering and damage to roads is allowed, knowing it can and will happen, how could it be any other way? Are we to believe that people with good and sound reasoning abilities would allow such things? It is my opinion that they would not. You?